[Skip to content]

Midwives magazine logo
Search our Site
E-zine

E-newsletters

The latest midwifery news and events sent straight to your inbox

Subscribe here...

ADVERTISEMENT
Products
.

How dangerous is it?

Emma Godfrey, editor, Midwives magazine
Emma Godfrey, editor, Midwives magazine
13.51, 14 January 2010

As many of us were tucking into our turkey and roast potatoes on Christmas Day, over the skies of Detroit a 23-year-old Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was attempting to detonate a bomb hidden in his clothing.

He had been a transit passenger when he was passing through Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport, and hence had not been required to pass through a security scanner. The passenger list had been transmitted to the US and no irregularities had been reported.

Fortunately for the passengers aboard the Northwest Airlines Flight 253, the bomb simply burnt Mr Abdulmutallab and did not detonate. The possible outcome does not really bear thinking about.

Now, governments are calling for the introduction of full body scanners at airports for everyone. For some, their primary concern is the issue of privacy and the scanners revealing too much of a person’s body – I thought we were talking scanners, not some cartoon-like machine that allows airport staff to view passengers naked! I suppose my first thought is the impact of scanning on pregnant women and the fetus. Hospitals go to great lengths to ascertain prior to an x-ray whether you could be pregnant, but now we are in effect going to be x-raying women for the greater good. We have no idea of the long-term effects of this. What happens if the woman is a frequent flyer? Surely repeated exposure to these scanners’ microwaves is going to have some impact, no matter how small? Will it affect fertility perhaps?

I ask the question – is it necessary to scan everyone? I know we want to prevent acts of terrorism, but could this be considered ‘over the top’? I guess if I had lost a family member to such an act, then my answer would no doubt be ‘no’ – but luckily I haven’t, and hence I think there must be a safer alternative.

What about profiling likely suspects and scanning only them? Would that then mean that every Middle Eastern and African Muslim for example travelling around the world would be singled out? I fear this would simply breed prejudice and fuel the stereotype. But we can’t avoid the facts – the majority of recent acts of terrorism have been carried out by men of Middle Eastern and African culture and/or descent. Is it fair to tar each with the same brush?

I think there are a couple of failings that could be addressed before the international blanket call for the use of full body scanning at airports. Firstly, there should be open communication between countries. If media reports are right, Mr Abdulmutallab had been refused entry to the UK – why wasn’t he on the US radar? Why when the passenger list was sent to the US for flight 253, didn’t someone pick this up? Secondly, surely there should be an international generic security system? No matter which airport you visit, in whichever country, the system should be the same. We can’t seem to get it right in the same airport, let alone nationally or internationally? If you stand in different lines at the same UK airport for example, some passengers will be asked simply to walk through security, others will need to remove shoes, and others will need to remove shoes, belts, and almost everything else!

I fear the answer to all this boils down to the culture of air travel. Passengers demand that the security system is as fast as possible, airlines are greedy, wanting to turn planes (and passengers) around faster and faster and inevitably corners are cut. But would the proposed system of scanning improve this, put more pressure on airport staff to be even more vigilant, or would they simply become complacent as mankind relies more and more on machines? But still, no one seems to be asking the question about how healthy these scans are? Governments are rushing in to seem to be proactive – maybe to win votes? But they are not thinking about the future and the implications. I guess they are just going to add this to the list of possible things that may damage your health. 

COMMENTS

1. At 22.09 on 15 January 2010, anon wrote:

On Dec 23rd at Inverness Airport, I was scanned so thoroughly, front, back, sides, arms, legs, posterior, head, I think it might have been easier to go through an X-ray type machine. I am now 74, have a pin & plate in my hip ( 7'l yrs ago) an artificial knee joint, a severely damaged shoulder, have long hair so wear a no of hairclips, I wear a leather belt with a buckle over my skirt, and a watch plus wedding band etc.  Oh and a copper bracelet. I have severe O.A. joints etc & had asked for help in boarding the plane. I also use a stick made for me by a now deceased neighbour from a piece of blackthorn with an horn top– this was put through the scanner, in case it had hidden compartments I was told. My overcoat, Gillet, & Jacket also & I had to have my Boots removed, though requested help in replacing it. The 5pm plane was delayed till 9-30pm our eventual arrival in Manchester was quarter to 2am, after a redirection for some time to Birmingham Airport!  I didn't mind the search in a way, but there must be some other means of searching, than the time all this took, I am a retired midwife for heaven's sake, someone whose commitment has been in bringing life into this world, and protecting it, not destroying it!!! Yet I suppose some elderly folk might well be used by terrorists if they were frightened or blackmailed sufficiently?


2. At 11.18 on 30 January 2010, Steph wrote:

Get a grip. This is not about political correctness, this is about safety at 37,000 ft. They can scan me and mine whenever, if it takes time so be it. I waited at Chicago airport in Aug 2001, there were no security checks, look what happened the month later. I bet the people on those 5 hijacked airlines wished there had been better security.


3. At 00.13 on 1 March 2010, anon wrote:

I agree with you. I can bet the cumulative radiation effect on millions of passengers who will be irradiated repeatedly will cause more harm than good. Cancer is already widespread; it will make it even more so.


4. At 15.07 on 25 March 2010, Ruth wrote:

I am a community midwife and had a lady now 6 weeks pregnant today asking if these scanners are safe in early pregnancy. Does anyone have a definate answer? Is there any evidence they are safe in early pregnancy?

Add a comment to this blog posting

Comments are added to the bottom of blog postings. They are moderated and will not be published until approved by the Midwives team. They may be edited.

 

» Indicates required fields

Make a comment
Can we display your name on the site? »