Birth after 35 - the older mother
This is report of a meeting of The Royal Society of Medicine's Forum on Maternity and the Newborn. The sessions were chaired by the forum's president Mr Eugene Oteng-Ntim and Dr Chandrima Biswas, obstetric specialist registrar.
Dr Basil Lee
Midwives magazine: December 2008 /January 2009
The science and signs of the biological clock.
William Ledger, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Head of the Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, University of Sheffield (Co-author).
Many women put off planning their first pregnancy until their late thirties or early forties, and by that age fertility treatment has little to offer if they cannot conceive naturally.
Although the chances of IVF working for younger women are increasing year on year, there has been little progress for the older patient (see Figures).
Figure 1. Chance of livebirth after a single cycle of IVF. UK HFEA data, early 1990s. Templeton & Parslow 1996
Figure 2. Chance of livebirth after a single cycle of IVF, Oxford Fertility Unit, 2000
The ideal age for a woman to have children is between 20 and 35; I
speak biology, not sociology. But in the past 20 years the average age
for women in the UK becoming pregnant has shifted from 25 to 34, a huge
rate of change in demographic terms. Recently, late conceptions
increased from 10.7 to 11.3 per 1000 (6% in one year). One may guess at
the causes of this, but importantly people do not understand its
implications.
There is no appreciation of the health risks of
pregnancy in older women, including increased risks of breast cancer,
premature birth and fetal abnormality. Similarly, the health risks to
offspring of having an older father (heart disease, some cancers,
schizophrenia) are not understood.
Although adult men make about 30 million sperm
daily, women never make a single new egg once they are born. They have
seven million primordial follicles at five to seven months of their
fetal lives, but only two million survive to birth, and there is
further attrition throughout life. Its not only the quantity but the
quality of the eggs that also declines with increasing age; chromosomal
abnormalities develop resulting in miscarriage, Down's syndrome and so
on.
How can we measure ovarian reserve?
I am interested in the use of a blood test taken on
the second day of the menstrual cycle. Inhibins are secreted in the
ovaries in the early phase of follicle development. Inhibin B is a
product of the granulosa cells, and identifying low levels of this
throughout the menstrual cycle up to ovulation indicates poor quantity
and quality of eggs for IVF. Good inhibin B levels promise eggs in
sufficient quantity and more embryos. Measurement of follicle
stimulating hormone (FSH) alone would not have shown the difference. An
early fall in inhibin levels indicates the onset of the menopause
earlier than a rise in FSH. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), another
granulosa cell product, is an even better indicator than inhibin B, and
is now a useful predictor of IVF outcome.
It may be useful to combine these markers to derive
an ovarian reserve index (ORI), derived mathematically from
unstimulated day 2 or 3 inhibin B, AMH and FSH. This optional test is
offered to women of between 30 and 45 who are planning to defer having
children. They must have regular periods (27 - 35 day cycle), must not
be using the oral contraceptive pill or other hormonal medications and
must have had at least three periods following childbirth. Polycystic
ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, and other medical disorders,
medications and so on, contraindicate the test.
The ORI reflects the remaining number of follicles
in the ovaries, establishes an individual’s ORI in relation to her age
group, and with repetition establishes a trend. It is not a complete
‘fertility test’, since it takes no account of male, uterine, and tubal
factors. We warn older women of the risks of deferring pregnancy even
if they have normal ORIs.
As more women defer childbirth the problems of the
biological clock become more acute. Nowadays 40 years is the new 20;
but women are living to 85, while their fertility is still failing at
40 as it was hundreds of years ago when women died at 45.
Consequences of being an older mother in pregnancy
Dr Katrina Erskine, Consultant Obstetrician and Physician, Homerton University Hospital (Co-author).
Compared
to women aged under 35 years, the older woman is more likely to be in a
stable relationship, be more mature, and to have better financial
resources. I shall be discussing a number of problems to which they are
more prone because of their age. These include in no particular order
stress incontinence, abnormal weight gain, obesity, antepartum
haemorrhage, premature rupture of the membranes, malpresentation,
fetopelvic disproportion, instrumental delivery, sphincter rupture,
caesarean section, late stillbirth and reduced energy. And grandparents
are more likely to die earlier in a child's life. For the older woman I
can be seen as the 'bad news' doctor!
More women are delaying
childbirth to their late 30s; they tend to be of higher socioeconomic
status in developed countries. Being less fertile, they are more likely
to need fertility assistance. They are 1.5 to two times more likely to
have multiple births, have an increased risk of stillbirth, are more
likely to have a chronic disease, and are more likely to have pregnancy
complications in both developed and developing countries.
There are
serious issues around fertility treatment. After adjusting for age and
parity, women receiving fertility treatment face a number of increased
risks. The odds ratio (OR – the ratio of the odds of an event occurring
in one group to the odds of it occurring in another group) for
pre-eclampsia is 1.9 , and significantly higher when ovum donation has
been used. The OR for placenta praevia is 3.9, and placental abruption
1.8, caesarian section (CS) 2.1, and preterm delivery 1.7. In total,
10% of women having fertility treatment by ovum donation will have
postpartum haemorrhages requiring hysterectomy, a statistic rarely
mentioned by the professionals.
Pregnancy with dichorionic twins
carries a four-fold increase in perinatal mortality and significantly
increased risks of pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, CS and cerebral
palsy.
Essential hypertension is more common among older mothers, and
here too there are increased risks of pre-eclampsia, utero-placental
dysfunction and abruption with possible stillbirth. If more than one
anti-hypertensive is required and there is significant proteinuria by
20 weeks the risks are even greater. Also, some anti-hypertensive drugs
have teratogenic effects.
The increased risks which diabetics run
include miscarriage, fetal abnormality, macrosomia and babies small
for gestational age (SGA), and stillbirth. They more frequently require
CS, and their condition is liable to be affected by pregnancy.
When in labour the older mother may expect longer
first and second stages, and an increased requirement for oxytocin in
both stages. Older women are more likely to need delivery by CS: OR
5.42 for elective CS , 2.67 for emergency CS. They have an increased
risk of postpartum haemorrhage , and admission of their babies for
neonatal care is more likely.
Advanced maternal age has an
independent risk of stillbirth, approximately doubling, possibly due
to the increased incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension or
gestational diabetes.There is an increase in stillbirth at 37 to 41
weeks, usually unexplained; increased surveillance should be carefully
considered in older women after 37 weeks.
As
professionals we should be informing younger childless women of the
risks of leaving childbearing until later. Older women are often
unaware of the increased risks they face. We need to discuss their
pregnancy intentions, their reducing fertility, the pregnancy
complications and the risks of assisted conception, including multiple
birth.
The older mother: a blessing, a fear or a fuss?
Ms Lowri Turner, Journalist
I am a woman who left pregnancy late – my babies
were born from age 35 to 42. I have polycystic ovaries, had problems
conceiving but eventually conceived naturally. Older women who read and
otherwise attend to the media are now panicking, having learned of all
the problems of pregnancy in their age group and that they have left it
too late. Research has concentrated on the diminishing reserve of our
ovaries and has omitted studying positive aspects. However, I cannot
believe that young women who are binge drinking and smoking are in the
best condition to have their babies either. Back then my lifestyle was
much the same, and my parents would have been horrified, even
embarrassed, to think that I was wasting an education and a career by
getting pregnant at that age. If a gynaecologist had asked me then to
consider my fertility I would have felt insulted - none of his/her
business. We don't want to be defined by our fertility or gender. Men
can and do ignore the biological realities; we're not allowed to do
that but we want to. The government may ordain maternity leave, but do
we want it? We would prefer to get back to work, and arrange child
care - not ideal for our babies to be sure.
We
older women feel our age and are adopting healthier lifestyles, but the
messages are scaring and punishing. And there's nothing to read about
the problems which older fathers face – it has come as news to me that
their babies may miscarry or, if born, have a greater risk of
developing schizophrenia.
One of the pressures on older women to conceive is
divorce and remarriage; we regard fertility treatment as a magic wand,
and it has come as a shock to me to learn of its dangers. Even at our
age the medical profession patronises us; we're not given credit for
mature decision-making, but it is we who are taking folic acid and have
up to a point informed ourselves of the risks we run. We still need
information, but do not deserve to be scolded or stigmatised. The
problem of equating our needs with the capabilities of our bodies
remains.
The older mother from the perspective of the anti-ageing culture
David Alpert, Founder of the International Institute for anti-ageing, London
Anti- ageing medicine is not to be confused with
aesthetic medicine – it looks at ways to improve the health span -
extending the healthy years and reducing the risk and incidence of
age-related disease as chronological age advances. The biological age
is that at which the body is functioning, and is preferably less than
the chronological age. A 74 year-old non-smoker with a low alcohol
consumption who is active and eats five daily servings of fruit and
vegetables has the same risk of dying as a 60 year old who has none of
these advantages. This is anti-ageing behaviour.
Professor Ledger and Dr Erskine have described the
degree to which the average age of conception has increased in recent
years, the liability of the older group to develop the diseases of
ageing – diabetes, hypertension, obesity – and the difficulties
they face with conception, assisted or otherwise.
Between the years of 1997 and 2006 the incidence of
chlamydia increased by 166% and of gonorrhoea by 46%; consider the
contribution of sexually transmitted diseases to infertility. The
pollution of the environment by heavy metals, plastics, pesticides and
industrial chemicals has a like effect.
Factors contributing to male infertility, aside
from the well known tight underwear, include bathing in hot water,
smoking marijuana, the use of laptop computers and cell phones, and
cigarette smoking. Coffee on the other hand has been shown to improve
male fertility.
Smoking before pregnancy or during breastfeeding
reduces the fertility of both male and female offspring, while higher
intake of beef by their mothers has a similar effect on the males.
The
high intake of carbohydrates increases ovulatory infertility; where
fats are concerned the greatest single factor having a negative effect
on fertility is trans fat (found in most margarines, many fast foods
and commercially baked products, they may be even more unhealthy than
saturated fats, boosting LDL cholesterol and triglycerides). The
converse is true of unsaturated fats.
The higher the proportion of plant rather than
animal protein in the diet the better for fertility; the benefits of
moderate exercise, full fat dairy products, and zinc are well
documented. Unfortunately, the past 50 years have seen the loss of
substantial amounts of beneficial elements in vegetables, fruit and
meat.
Any hormonal treatment is best balanced to achieve homoeostasis, using bioidentical products in physiological dosage.
Finally, the negative effects of stress, overt or subclinical, on fertility are not to be ignored.
Vitamin A has an important role in healthy cell
differentiation, DNA repair and apoptosis (a form of programmed cell
death in multicellular organisms), yet women are being advised to avoid
it in pregnancy –when giving subfertile women nutritional advice, we
must separate the wheat from the chaff.